University of Central Florida Undergraduate Research Journal - A Practicality Analysis Pertaining to Minimally <br/> Invasive Robot-Assisted Urologic Surgery
US tab

References

  1. Millin, T. Retropubic Urinary Surgery. Livinstone, 1947.
  2. Clayman, R. V., Kavoussi, L. R., Soper, N. J., et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. New England Journal of Medicine. 1991; 324: 1370.
  3. Kwoh Y.S., H. J., Jonckheere E.A., Hayati, S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988; 35: 153.
  4. Skolarus, T. A., Zhang, Y., Hollenbeck, B. K. Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: Gathering the evidence. Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research. 2010; 10: 421.
  5. Yohannes, P., Rotariu, P., Pinto, P., et al. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: Is there adifference in the learning curve? Urology. 2002; 60: 39.
  6. Grover, S., Tan, G., Srivastava, A., Leung, R.A., Tewari, A.K. Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents. Current Urology Reports. 2010; 11: 87.
  7. Tewari, A. K., Patel, N. D., Leung, R. A., et al. Visual cues as a surrogate for tactile feedback during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Posterolateral margin rates in 1340 consecutive patients. British Journal of Urology International. 2010; 106: 528.
  8. Kim, Y. T., Kim, S. W., Jung, Y. W. Robotic surgery in gynecologic field. Yonsei Medical Journal. 2008; 49:886.
  9. Yee, D. S., Shanberg, A. M., Duel, B. P., et al. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology. 2006; 67: 599.
  10. Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., Desai, J. P., et al. Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Annals of Surgery. 2004; 239: 14.
  11. Intuitive Surgical. Welcome to Intuitive Surgical. www.intuitivesurgical.com/company/. Published 2012. Acessed October, 2011.
  12. Babbar, P., Hemal, A. K. Robot-assisted urologic surgery in 2010: Advancements and future outlook. Urology Annals. 2011; 3: 1.
  13. Spahn, D., Theusinger, O., Hofmann, A. Patient blood management is a win-win: A wake-up call. British of Journal Anaesthesia. 2012; 108: 889.
  14. Fogarty, B., Khan, K., Ashall, G., et al. Complications of long operations: A prospective study of morbidity associated with prolonged operative time (> 6 h). British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1999; 52: 33.
  15. Licht, M. R., Klein, E. A. Early hospital discharge after radical retropubic prostatectomy: Impact on cost and complication rate. Urology. 1994; 44: 700.
  16. Liou, L. S. Radical Prostatectomy. MedlinePlus. www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/patientinstructions/000301.htm May 2011. Acessed November 2011.
  17. Patel, V. R. Robotic Urologic Surgery. London:Springer-Verlag, 2007.
  18. Guilamo-Ramos, V., Jaccard, J., Dittus, P., Bouris, A., Holloway, I., & Casillas, E. (2007). Adolescent expectancies, parent-adolescent communication and intentions to have sexual intercourse among inner-city, middle school youth. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 34, 56-66.
  19. Ficarra, V., Cavalleri, S., Novara, G., et al. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A Systematic review. European Urology. 2007; 51: 45.
  20. Joseph, J. V., Vicente, I., Madeb, R., et al. Robot-assisted vs. pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Are there any differences? British Journal of Urology International. 2005; 96: 39.
  21. Rocco, B., Matei, D. V., Melegari, S., et al. Robotic vs. open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: A matched-pair analysis. British Journal of Urology International. 2009;104: 991.
  22. Lotan, Y., Cadeddu, J. A., Gettman, M. T. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: Cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. Journal of Urology. 2004; 172: 1431.
  23. Ficarra, V., Novara, G., Artibani, W., et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A Systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. European Urology. 2009; 55: 1037.
  24. Patel, V. R., Coelho, R. F., Chauhan, S., et al. Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon. British Journal of Urology International. 2010; 106: 696.
  25. Bolenz, C., Gupta, A., Hotze, T., et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. European Urology. 2010; 57: 453.
  26. Bolenz, C., Freedland, S. J., Hollenbeck, B. K., et al. Costs of Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. European Urology. 2012.
  27. Patel, V. R., Thaly, R., Shah, K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: Outcomes of 500 cases. British Journal of Urology International. 2007; 99: 1109.
  28. Coelho, R. F., Chauhan, S., Palmer, K. J., et al. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A review of current outcomes. British Journal of Urology International. 2009; 104: 1428.
  29. Rogers, C., Diaz, M., Siddiqui, S., et al. 1311 long-term biochemical recurrence in 3625 patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal of Urology. 2011; 185: 524.
  30. Sung, G. T., Gill, I. S., Hsu, T. H. S. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A pilot study. Urology. 1999; 53: 1099.
  31. Link, R. E., Bhayani, S. B., Kavoussi, L. R. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Annals of Surgery. 2006; 243: 486.
  32. Singh, I., Hemal, A. K. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty:Review of the current literature, technique and outcome. Canadian Journal of Urology. 2010; 17: 5099.
  33. Inagaki, T., Rha, K. H., Ong, A. M., et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Current status. British Journal of Urology International. 2005; 95: 102.
  34. Seideman, C. A., Sleeper, J. P., Lotan, Y. Cost comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Journal of Endourology. 2012; 26: 1044.
  35. Patel, V. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology. 2005 66: 45.
  36. Weise, E. S., Winfield, H. N. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Journal of Endourology. 2006; 20: 813.
  37. Singh, I. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Current review of the technique and literature. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2009; 5:87.
  38. Gettman, M. T., Blute, M. L., Chow, G. K., et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technique and initial clinical experience with da Vinci robotic System. Journal of Urology. 2004; 64: 914.
  39. Sukumar, S., Rogers, C. G. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Journal of Endourology. 2011; 25: 151.
  40. Mir, S. A., Cadeddu, J. A., Sleeper, J. P., et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. Journal of Endourology. 2011; 25: 447.
  41. Muneer, A., Arya, M., Shergill, I. S., et al. Current status of robotic surgery in pediatric urology. Pediatric Surgery International. 2008; 24: 973.
  42. Beasley, K. A., Al Omar, M., Shaikh, A., et al. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy. Journal of Urology. 2004; 64: 458.
  43. Benway, B. M., Wang, A. J., Cabello, J. M., et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: Technique and outcomes. European Urology. 2009; 55: 592.
  44. Benway, B. M., Bhayani, S. B., Rogers, C. G., et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: A multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. Journal of Urology. 2009; 182: 866.
  45. DiBona, G. F. Nervous kidney interaction between renal sympathetic nerves and the renin-angiotensin System in the control of renal function. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 1083.
  46. Cohn, W. E. Advances in surgical treatment of acute and chronic coronary artery disease. Texas Heart Institute Journal. 2010; 37: 328.
  47. Marescaux, J., Leroy, J., Gagner, M., et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature. 2001; 413: 379.