University of Central Florida Undergraduate Research Journal - Cross-Modal Distraction on Simultaneous Translation: Language Interference in Spanish-English Bilinguals
US tab

References

  1. Anderson, C. (2016, August 08). Spanish 101 1,000 Most Common Spanish Words. Retrieved June 12, 2018, from http://www.101languages.net/spanish/most-common-spanish-words.
  2. Brauer, M. (1998). Stroop interference in bilinguals: The role of similarity between the two languages. In A. F. Healy, L. E. Bourne, Jr., A. F. Healy and L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 317-337). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  3. Cauchard, F., Cane, J. E., & Weger, U. W. (2012). Influence of Background Speech and Music in Interrupted Reading: An Eye-Tracking Study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 381–390. https://doi-org.ezproxy.net.ucf.edu/10.1002/acp.1837.
  4. Chen, H.-c. & C. Ho (1986). Development of Stroop interference in Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12(3): 397-401.
  5. COCA. (n.d.). Word frequency data. Retrieved from https://www.wordfrequency.info.
  6. Crook, J. (2017, December 6). Audacity (Version 2.2.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved May 15, 2018, from https://www.audacityteam.org.
  7. Desjardins, J. L. & F. Fernandez (2018). Performance on Auditory and Visual Tasks of Inhibition in English Monolingual and Spanish-English Bilingual Adults: Do Bilinguals Have a Cognitive Advantage? Journal Of Speech, Language, And Hearing Research 61,410-419.
  8. Dyer, F. N., & Army Medical Research Lab., F. K. (1970). Color Naming Interference in Monolinguals and Bilinguals with Matching and Non-Matching Interfering and Naming Languages. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10, 297-302.
  9. E-Prime (Version 3) [Computer software]. (2018). Sharpsburg, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
  10. FREE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TESTS. (2004). Retrieved July 20, 2018, from http://www.world-english.org/tests.htm.
  11. Guasch, M., Boada, R., Ferré, P., & Sánchez-Casas, R. (2013). NIM: A Web-based Swiss Army knife to select stimuli for psycholinguistic studies. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 765-771. Retrieved from https://psico.fcep.urv.cat/utilitats/nim/index_esp.php.
  12. George S. Klein, a. (1964). Semantic Power Measured through the Interference of Words with Color-Naming. The American Journal Of Psychology, 77(4), 576-588. doi:10.2307/1420768.
  13. Harley, T. A. (2001). The psychology of language from data to theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  14. Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., Hurlstone, M., Marsh, J. E., Macken, W. J., Jones, D. M. (2011). Distruption of cognitive performance by sound: Differentiating two forms of auditory distraction. International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. Retrieved from UCF Library Database.
  15. Lawson, E. A. (1967). ATTENTION AND SIMULTANEOUS TRANSLATION. Language & Speech 10(1): 29-35.
  16. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203.
  17. Mägiste, E. (1984). Stroop tasks and dichotic translation: The development of interference patterns in bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10(2): 304-315.
  18. Pool, M. M., Koolstra, C. M., & van der Voort, T. H. (2003). The impact of background radio and television on high school students homework performance. Journal of Communication, 53(1), 74-87. Retrieved from UCF Library.
  19. Preston, M. S. (1965). Inter-lingual interference in a bilingual version of the Stroop color-word task. (Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, 1965) Retrieved from UCF Library.
  20. Salamé, P. & Baddeley, A. (1989). Effects of Background Music on Phonological Short-Term Memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A Human Experimental Psychology, 41(1), 107–122. DOI: 10.1080/14640748908402355.
  21. Soveri, A., Laine, M., Hämäläinen, H., & Hugdahl, K. (2011). Bilingual advantage in attentional control: Evidence from the forced-attention dichotic listening paradigm. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 371-378. DOI:10.1017/S1366728910000118.
  22. Spanish Test. (2018). Retrieved July 20, 2018, from https://www.cervantes.to/test_inicial.html.
  23. SPSS Statistics (Version 23) [Computer software]. (n.d.). Chicago, IL: IBM.
  24. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643-662.